Mendelian Genetics Lab

Background

The laws of segregation, independent assortment, and dominance, discovered in the mid 19th century by Gregor Mendel, form the basis of all genetics. The ability to predict the results of crossing experiments and explain any variance between expected and observed results is still a vital part of our understanding of heredity. The relationship between the genotype and the phenotype of an organism is now understood with better clarity than it was in the early part of the 20th century. Today our ability to determine gene sequences in individual organisms and populations of organisms has allowed us to deepen our understanding of heredity. In this lab assignment you will experiment with monohybrid crosses and explore the role of chance in genetics.

 

  • attachment

    suo_bio1020_escikit_w5_lab_template.docx
  • attachment

    suo_bio1020_lab_5_mendelian_genetics_instructions.pdf

Trends W2 Discussion

Review the four recommendations in the IOM report The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health and find your state’s action coalition.

Discuss your state’s action coalition’s work as it aligns with these four recommendations.

Is each recommendation being addressed?

Based on your analysis of the website, how would you describe your state’s progress toward meeting the IOM recommendations?

NR631 Week 7 PR

Our week 7 TD focuses on the budget.  This week’s TD was designed assuming all students would be in a traditional practicum setting.  The main prompt will be hard to address for the virtual students so I’ll pose a different question for you.

Traditional students (Sherry and Stephan): Respond to the main prompt related to your actual project.  You may have to dust off some of your notes from NR533 and refresh your memory on concepts and tools such as variance and forecasting.  For many nurse leaders, budget and finance is a weak point in their skill set.  But it’s important to understand the budget process in your organization.

You’ll recall that as part of developing your project charter (Week 2), you submitted a preliminary budget. This week’s lesson goes into much greater depth on the financial aspects of a project. This is a good time to look at your preliminary budget, consider what was presented in this week’s lesson, and reflect back on other financial concepts and tools you learned throughout the nurse executive track. Use the following questions as the basis for your discussion this week.

  • What variances can you identify on your project to date? If you had to report on the reason for variances +/- 10% of budget, what would your report say?

Think back to lessons and discussions on forecasting. What adjustments do you feel you need to make to your project budget based on your progress to date and what you foresee moving forward? What changed to cause you to have to adjust (forecast) the project budget?

???? Virtual students: You are told that your original budget of $1 million is being cut to $750,000.00.  Go back to the budgets that you set for your project where I encouraged you to budget for most, if not all (or more) of the $1 million.  Given this reduction in your budget, what changes will you make to bring your project in line with the new amount?  Talk about your decision-making process.  What will you cut and why?  How will this impact the overall success or quality of your project?

Important note: All projects have a budget!!!  No project is “budget neutral” or “costs nothing to the organization”.  Even if you’re the only person assigned to the project, your salary or the time you spend on the project is costing the organization money.  Please think carefully about your project’s resources and the financial implications of your project.  As executive leaders this is an important aspect of your role.

Creating An Afterschool Menternship Program

Intervention and Program Theory: A description of the intervention theory and program theory relevant to your proposed Clarksville program. (Remember, for your proposed Clarksville program, your program theory would be an explicit description of your program’s components and how you envision these components working together to effect positive change in your clients or the Clarksville).

Article Analysis And Evaluation

Search the GCU Library and find one new health care article that uses quantitative research. Do not use an article from a previous assignment, or that appears in the Topic Materials or textbook.

Complete an article analysis and ethics evaluation of the research using the “Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics” template. See Chapter 5 of your textbook as needed, for assistance.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

AttachmentsHLT-362V-RS5-ArticleAnalysisEthicalEval-Template.docx

Discussion Mod 2

In your Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, locate the information about ‘citations in text’ and ‘reference examples’. Share with your classmates 3 items to remember about citing in text and 3 items to remember about formatting references while writing papers.

https://library.stritch.edu/getmedia/68645fbb-f965-4ea0-a63d-14672a6c5fb7/APAStyleGuide6

Research Paper

Biology

Biology Hypothesis

In this lab, we were hoping to be able to do some genetics experiments with your fast plants. That doesn’t get to happen now, but THINK about those fast plants for a minute. Based on the setup of the fast plant experiment (see powerpoint slides 28-32 for more details), answer the following prompts.

1. What would be a good quality and reasonable hypothesis for experiment 8.1 (the monohybrid cross described on slide 31)?

2. What would be your prediction for the results from this experiment, if your hypothesis is true?

3. What would be good quality and reasonable hypothesis for experiment 8.2 (the dihybrid cross described on slide 32)?

4. What would be your prediction for the results from this experiment, if your hypothesis is true?

  • attachment

    7.210LMitosisMeiosisandStartMendelianGenetics_2020edit1.pptx

Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory TW5D1

·Review this week’s Learning Resources on Piaget’s cognitive development theory. Pay particular attention to the description of each state of cognitive development.

· Consider a favorite toy or game you played with during childhood or adolescence.

· Using Piaget’s theory, identify the stage of development you were in when you played with this toy or game. How did the skills evident in that stage affect how you played with your toy or game?

 

Post a response to the following:

Describe your favorite toy or game as a child. Indicate at which cognitive stage of development you were when you played with this toy and explain how your play reflected that stage of cognitive development. Provide scholarly citations and references to support your post. approx. 300 words with cites/references